HomeUSA newsMarijuana users have a constitutional right to own firearms, judge rules

Marijuana users have a constitutional right to own firearms, judge rules

Date:

Related stories

Transforming Liberia Begins in Nimba County: A Call for Sovereign Rebirth

By: Rev. Torli H. Krua, contributing writer Liberia stands...

Riding the Bus This Summer in OC

Residents riding the bus this summer could see...

These Pets at OC Animal Care Are Looking for a Home

Dilora Dilora has been at OC Animal Care in...

Hogan: Truth To Power

I am writing this OP/Ed for Ashley Foster, ...

Liberia: Adoption Home Shut Down as Arrest Warrant Issued for Staff Over Child Abuse Charges

PAYNESVILLE, Montserrado —A local adoption agency with partners...
spot_imgspot_img

A federal judge in Oklahoma ruled Friday that a law that prohibits marijuana users from owning firearms is unconstitutional.

The ruling is the latest challenge to firearms regulations after the conservative majority on the US Supreme Court set new standards for reviewing the nation’s firearms laws.

AR-15 style rifles are displayed for sale at Firearms Unknown, a gun store in Oceanside, California, USA, April 12, 2021

AR-15 style rifles are displayed for sale at Firearms Unknown, a gun store in Oceanside, California, USA, April 12, 2021
(REUTERS/Bing Guan/File photo)

US District Judge Patrick Wyrick in Oklahoma City dismissed an indictment against Jared Michael Harrison, who was charged in August with violating a federal law making it illegal for “illegal users or addicts of controlled substances” to possess firearms. .

Harrison’s lawyers had argued that the portion of the federal firearms law focused on drug users or addicts was inconsistent with the nation’s storied tradition of gun regulation, echoing what the US Supreme Court ruled. USA last year in a case known as New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. bruen. That case set new standards for interpreting the Second Amendment.

GOP RENEWS PUSH TO ARM FEDERAL JUDGES AMID RISING THREATS OF VIOLENCE

Federal prosecutors, on the other hand, had argued that the portion of the law focused on drug users is “consistent with a long historical tradition in the United States of disarming suspected risk-takers, namely criminals, the mentally ill, and the intoxicated.” .

Gerry Lee practices his shooting skills at the Clark Brothers Gun Store and Shooting Range in Warrenton, Virginia, about 48 miles from Washington, DC, on January 16, 2020.

Gerry Lee practices his shooting skills at the Clark Brothers Gun Store and Shooting Range in Warrenton, Virginia, about 48 miles from Washington, DC, on January 16, 2020.
(EVA HAMBACH/AFP via Getty Images)

Wyrick agreed with Harrison’s attorneys, ruling Friday that federal prosecutors’ arguments that Harrison’s status as a marijuana user “justifies stripping him of his fundamental right to possess a firearm … is not a means constitutionally permissible to disarm Harrison”.

“But the mere use of marijuana does not have any of the characteristics that the nation’s history and tradition of gun regulation supports,” Wyrick said.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The decision comes after the New Orleans-based US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled Thursday that a federal law that bars people with domestic violence restraining orders from having the constitutional right to own guns of fire.

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

spot_img

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here