A former Virginia Tech women’s soccer player who accused her coach of benching her because of her political views will reportedly receive at least $100,000 as part of a settlement to dismiss a federal lawsuit.
Kiersten Hening will receive the award as part of a settlement in the lawsuit he filed in 2021 against head coach Charles “Chugger” Adair on First Amendment grounds, his attorney Cameron Norris said last week, according to the Roanoke Times.
Norris noted that the terms of the agreement did not include an admission of wrongdoing by his client or Adair.
There are no details of the agreement in court records, according to the outlet, but Norris said the agreement must be approved by university and state officials before it becomes final.
FORMER VIRGINIA TECH FOOTBALL PLAYER ALLEGEDLY LEFT ON THE BENCH FOR REFUSING TO KNEEL ALLOWED TO PROCEED WITH LAWSUIT: JUDGE

Kiersten Hening alleges her coach retaliated against her for her political views after she refused to take a knee during a pregame “unity statement” in the fall 2020 season.
(Hokie Sports)
Hening, who was a midfielder/defender for the Hokies from 2018 to 2020, sued Adair in her personal and official capacity as a coach, alleging that he chastised her for political views, which often differed from those of her teammates during the height of the game. Black Lives Matter movement. in 2020.
BLACK LIVES MATTER HAS NEARLY $42 MILLION IN ASSETS: IRS DOCS
Hening claimed she was removed from her starting position and pressured to leave the team after she refused to kneel during a reading of a “unity statement” before a game against UVA on September 12, 2020. She said Adair he “verbally attacked her” at halftime, claiming she was “losing and moaning” while sticking his finger in her face.
Hening explained in the lawsuit that while he “supports social justice and believes Black lives matter,” he “does not support the BLM organization,” citing its “mission statement basic tenets and tactics, including defunding police”.

Virginia Tech Hokies fans cheer during the second quarter against the North Carolina Tar Heels at Lane Stadium.
(Reinhold Matay-USA TODAY Sports)
Adair continued to berate Hening until he benched her, eventually making things so intolerable that she felt she had no choice but to leave the team, according to the lawsuit.
On December 2, federal Judge Thomas Cullen denied a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, noting that Hening’s time on the field decreased following the kneeing incident. Adair had argued that two other players who refused to take a knee did not face reduced playing time.
“Ultimately, Adair can convince a jury that this coach’s decision was based solely on Hening’s poor play during the UVA game, but the court, looking at the evidence from Hening’s most favorable point of view, cannot reach that conclusion as a matter of law.” ruled Cullen, who said the issues in the case are fundamental.
GIANTS PITCHER SAM COONROD REFUSES TO KNEEL DURING MOMENT OF IMPORTANCE OF BLACK LIVES BECAUSE OF FAITH: ‘I AM A CHRISTIAN’
The three-day trial scheduled to begin later this month was canceled last Tuesday in a court filing that said the case had been settled.
On January 4, Adair released a statement on Twitter, saying in part, “I am pleased that the case against me has been closed and I am free to move forward without committing any crime.”
“It is unfortunate, but this ordeal stemmed from disappointment and disagreement over playing time. Today, it is clear to us that this case was without merit and, without evidence, the truth prevailed,” said Adair, who did not mention the settlement. .
Attorney Adam Mortara tweeted in response to Adair’s statement: “If by clarity you mean he’s paying my client six figures in a settlement then you’re right that’s pretty clear. Honestly Coach please read the opinion of the court. You’re paying. Defendants don’t pay in cases that don’t have standing.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Mortara went on to thank Adair and his “bosses at Tech for paying several years’ worth of tuition.”


