HomeUSA newsNew Hampshire judge rejects lawsuit against state's largest city to prevent planned...

New Hampshire judge rejects lawsuit against state’s largest city to prevent planned eviction of homeless encampment

Date:

Related stories

Transforming Liberia Begins in Nimba County: A Call for Sovereign Rebirth

By: Rev. Torli H. Krua, contributing writer Liberia stands...

Riding the Bus This Summer in OC

Residents riding the bus this summer could see...

These Pets at OC Animal Care Are Looking for a Home

Dilora Dilora has been at OC Animal Care in...

Hogan: Truth To Power

I am writing this OP/Ed for Ashley Foster, ...

Liberia: Adoption Home Shut Down as Arrest Warrant Issued for Staff Over Child Abuse Charges

PAYNESVILLE, Montserrado —A local adoption agency with partners...
spot_imgspot_img

A judge on Tuesday threw out a lawsuit against New Hampshire’s largest city to prevent the planned eviction of homeless people in a camp.

The camp, which can hold up to 50 people, received a notice earlier this month from the city of Manchester that it must be completely vacated by midnight on Tuesday.

The ACLU of New Hampshire and New Hampshire Legal Assistance filed the lawsuit Friday and a hearing was held. The city agreed to wait until the end of operations on Tuesday, but it was not immediately clear when that would proceed.

FENTANYL-RELATED OVERDOSES LEAD TO RECORD HOMELESS DEATHS IN SEATTLE AREA

“We do not believe it is humane to evict these homeless individuals without a plan to immediately house and sustainably relocate them during the coldest month of the year,” said Gilles Bissonnette, legal director for the ACLU of New Hampshire.

A judge has thrown out a lawsuit against Manchester, New Hampshire, to prevent the planned eviction of a homeless encampment.

A judge has thrown out a lawsuit against Manchester, New Hampshire, to prevent the planned eviction of a homeless encampment.

City officials said they had public health and safety concerns about the encampment.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The judge said that if there were no safe alternatives available, he would agree that the forced removal of the camp would likely violate the state and federal constitutional rights of the people who live there. He mentioned that the city needs to continue working on 24-hour shelter options.

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

spot_img

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here